Видео

V1=65 knots, Vr =67, climb 72/84 knots and Keep above blue line, always 😊

@@KonstantinosPlatis thanks!

13:55 thanks for the feedback, it was corrected in recent videos. Thanks for taking the time to watch my videos

I agree with you. Actualy this plane likes sea level and good weather. There are a couple more videos with the P2006T at my channel if you wish to check it out😊

Good points. Close to gliders: they don't like the downwash. Landing gear very early retract: keep the gear down as long as you have runway available plus his Gear takes very long to retract. With very high density altitude and OEI you never climb with this airplane so better keep the gear alittle longer up.

@@KonstantinosPlatis I still think that if it's a critical takeoff, you have little runway, high density altitude and with an inoperative engine you don't climb and you still decide to take off, I would have gotten closer to the gliders and raised the gear with ground effect. In any case, it's a comment, your flights seem excellent to me. I've been following you for a long time. Thanks for answering.

@@mt4130 you are right, T/O should be a no go since you need to consider the OEI climbing factor. The only reason i took this risk was that i was alone at the airplane and also wanted to check the climbing tables with the reality (which are far away as noticed) Regarding zoom T/O i am in favor anyway. At 3.09 Minute i mention that i keep it down to reach if possible the blue line and you have a good point at that moment to bring the gear lever up and be clean somehow on the way up. But as i mentioned the gear takes very long for this plane to retract( check the red transition light ) and in case of crash landing i prefer to have the gear down due to its robustness. Finally thank you for your feedback and as you know in aviation we learn from our mistakes as soon as they are not....fatal. Thank you for following my channel.

@@KonstantinosPlatis Thank you very much for your time and I apologize if I have bothered you at any time. Good flights

@@mt4130 most Welcome

Hi Robin, Thank you for your feedback. The max. Useful weight in this airplane is only 394 kg. One Pilot, one passenger and full full is: 2 X 80= 160 + 140 = 200 kgrs+ 836 kgrs empty weight = 1036 kgrs. !!! This will not make Triengen one day with high density altitude and OEI! Triengen is also a challenging short Field particularly with Biese (irregular north Wind with gusts and windshiering) and you don't want to find yourself with 10 knots tailwind while flaring. Regarding upgrading to this airplane you should definitely consider if a 394 max useful weight MEP makes sense to own privately. Thanks again for following my videos. More to come. Konstantinos

@@KonstantinosPlatis Thanks for your reply - yes I’m really only thinking of it as a two seater - in that it’s not so dissimilar to many of the lower power piston singles re useful load.

@@robinhilliard in this case is a good decision. Iam on editing another video with " flying five airports in one afternoon. In this way you can have a better picture of the capabilities of this aircraft. Konstantinos

Hi John, you are absolutely right. In my Case Iam talking about circuits. When you have a small trainer in front of you for separation reason you delay making inner cycles ( and not external like in other airport) and that's a particularity of Birrfeld. Thank you for the feedback and there is another video with tecnam p2006t coming: 5 Swiss airports in one afternoon. Thank you again for following my videos 😊

@@KonstantinosPlatis Ah I see. That's particularly relevant with a fast twin. There's a decent chance I might have been in the light trainer ahead if it was at Birrfeld. I saw a Tecnam twin there on Tuesday morning.

@@johnfau06 👍it was me. Wednesday also 🙏

Hi David, Talking about Triengen, there is one entering sector which is the East. It's a short runway between two hills. I suggest entering sector East, go overhead check the wind and plan 2300 feet QNH on left or right downwind. Look out for traffic and the base for RW 15 is short. Don't forget short field landing procedure, if you arrive at the threshold with high speed please go around since the runway is somehow short. Hope it helps

@@KonstantinosPlatis Sector W, my god, i was referring to the E one, sorry (lack of coffee ;-) ). THANKS for the tips! Feels a bit similar to Wangen-Lachen. Coffee on me, if you pass by LSGE.

Thank you 😊 if you wish, check also the landing at Lausanne (first Part) and the other videos.

@@KonstantinosPlatis yes surely I will !

That's the restaurant and I think the tower

Thank you 😊

Yes it is. Have you a MEP class licence?

@@KonstantinosPlatis no only SEP, but thinking about to do it

Check my other videos in case you have available time.

During turbulence is better to keep both hands at the controls and switch the autopilot off...well at least with this airplane 🙂. Anyway thanks for the comments and check my other videos for further references.

Nice to hear...please check my other videos. You might find interesting information for FSX flying.

That's my wishlist too...for the use as a trainer there's no need but for a private owner is very well needed. That's the only way to increase payload and fly high... I think they invested at the model 2012 instead which makes sense since they need to keep profitability.

Iam sorry the wording is wrongly mentioned. There is not any Upgrade on horsepower. The 912 s 100 HP remains the same!. By upgrading I mean certified rotax...serviced and signed from a EASA PART -145 Facility and not privat serviced. The floater of the carburetors are also weighted individual and kept the same weight. Finally with upgrade I don't mean higher Power which is actually my wish list for this plane...a solution should be to place the turbo rotax but this will mean to certify the plane again.. Please check my other videos also...

@@KonstantinosPlatis 98 Horses each 😅😅 I am looking forward to watch your videos. One day I intend to buy a plane for myself. Edit - If you chose to go with the upgradation please put that on RUclips too.

I would imagine that an “Edge Performance” mod could work. We’re in the Rockies so we too word want some additional engine performance safety margin. Attractive training considerations, especially near sea level!👊🤙🤘❤️✈️

Thank you. I think there two already....